Maths Explore

Hydraulics · sample calcsheet · 6 pages

Hydraulic jump in a dam basin

Water spilling over a dam races down the chute and enters the stilling basin shallow and fast; a hydraulic jump turns it back into deep, slow flow and destroys most of its energy on the way. This sheet finds the discharge over the ogee crest, steps the flow down the spillway in three reaches to estimate the friction loss along it (local losses at the crest and the toe are neglected), solving each reach's depth with root(), then sizes the jump: the sequent depth, the energy head destroyed and the power the basin must absorb. Crest, chute and basin are rectangular and of one width.

First page of the Hydraulic jump in a dam basin sample calcsheet in Maths Explore
The first page of the calcsheet as it appears in Maths Explore.

What this calculation covers

Inputs

  • Reservoir level above the basin floor
  • Spillway crest above the basin floor
  • Width of crest, chute and basin
  • Ogee crest discharge coefficient
  • Flow-path length of the chute, crest to toe
  • Darcy friction factor of the concrete chute
  • Density of water

Discharge over the crest

The ogee crest acts as a weir: the discharge grows with the head over the crest to the power 3/2. The flow passes through the critical depth close to the crest, which is the depth and velocity the first reach starts from.

  • Head over the crest
  • Discharge over the crest
  • Discharge per unit width
  • Critical depth, taken as the depth at the crest
  • Velocity at the crest

The chute, in three reaches

The chute is split into three reaches of equal length. In each, the energy equation is written between its two ends — bed level, plus the depth measured normal to the bed (y·cos θ), plus the velocity head — with the Darcy–Weisbach friction loss taken at the mean of the friction slopes at the two ends: the standard-step method. That loss depends on the unknown downstream depth, so each reach's balance is solved implicitly with root().

  • Chute inclination to the horizontal
  • Length of each reach
  • Bed drop over each reach
  • Mean velocity at depth y
  • Hydraulic radius at depth y

Friction slope and energy at a station

  • Friction slope at depth y
  • Energy head at bed level z and depth y

Reach 1: from the crest

  • Energy balance of reach 1, zero at its end depth
  • Depth at the end of reach 1
  • Friction loss in reach 1
  • Energy head at the end of reach 1

Reach 2

  • Energy balance of reach 2, zero at its end depth
  • Depth at the end of reach 2
  • Friction loss in reach 2
  • Energy head at the end of reach 2

Reach 3: to the toe

  • Energy balance of reach 3, zero at its end depth
  • Depth at the end of reach 3
  • Friction loss in reach 3
  • Energy head at the end of reach 3

The three reaches side by side

Collected as vectors: the depth and velocity at the end of each reach, and the loss in each. The flow keeps accelerating down the chute, so most of the loss falls in the last reach — judging the whole chute by its toe velocity alone would roughly double the total.

  • Depth at the end of each reach
  • Velocity at the end of each reach
  • Friction loss in each reach
  • Friction loss along the whole chute
  • Same loss from the toe velocity alone

The jump in the basin

The toe depth and velocity are the jump's upstream conditions. For a rectangular channel the momentum equation gives the depth after the jump from the upstream Froude number (the Bélanger equation); a jump forms only if the entering flow is supercritical.

  • Depth entering the basin
  • Velocity entering the basin
  • Froude number at velocity u and depth y
  • Froude number entering the basin
  • Supercritical entry, so a jump forms
  • Sequent depth after the jump
  • Velocity after the jump
  • Subcritical after the jump
  • Basin length the jump needs, about 6·y₂
  • Steady-jump range, lower bound
  • Steady-jump range, upper bound

Energy destroyed in the jump

  • Specific energy entering the basin
  • Specific energy after the jump
  • Energy head destroyed by the jump
  • Matches the closed-form jump loss
  • Share of the entering energy destroyed
  • Power dissipated in the basin

Results summary

  • Over its 1.30 m head the ogee crest passes 11.9 m³/s, 2.96 m²/s per metre of width. Stepping down the chute the depth thins from the 0.96 m critical depth to 0.43, 0.34 and 0.29 m at the ends of the three reaches while the velocity climbs to 10.1 m/s; the friction loss along the way is 0.52 m, over half of it in the last reach — judged from the toe velocity alone it would be 1.02 m. The flow enters the basin at Fr = 6.0, a steady jump: the sequent depth is 2.33 m, the jump needs about 14 m of basin, and it destroys 3.1 m of head — 56% of what enters — which at this discharge is 361 kW turned into turbulence and heat.

Try changing…

  • Raise the reservoir to H_r := 6.5 m — the crest head grows to 1.8 m and the discharge to 19 m³/s; the toe runs faster, and the sequent depth and the power both climb.
  • Roughen the chute, f_d := 0.04 — the friction loss doubles, the toe velocity and Fr₁ drop, and the jump is weaker: a shallower sequent depth and less power destroyed.
  • Shorten the chute to L_s := 7 m — a 42° slope with less length to rub on: the loss falls, the toe is faster and the jump stronger. Compare h_f with h_f.one as you go.

All samples